Completely inane rubbish. Practising will let anyone with reasonable balance do this, but what a waste of a life. Why doesn't he study to find a cure for cancer instead of dicking about like a circus dwarf?
In Canada we shoot unicyclists on sight unless they're going over Niagara.
The Nips high jumping are better entertainment.
Glumbert is a sociological study accordingly to chummin or was it streamline as posted on a previous video, apparently our postings will be a case study and our names will become legendary amongst students and teachers
Here is a secret message that holds the key to life for students/teachers to fathom out
A guitar playing tramp sat under a tree, a cat silhouetted by the full moon, people danced and sang, smiled and laughed, not a care in the world, they were young and had their whole lives ahead of them…the tramp slowly stopped playing the cat jumped from the tree, the people stopped dancing and stared at the tramp, a trickling of blood appeared from the tramps mouth. Life had been taken from him without notice.
Mr. Skids good morning(for me here it is ) How are you?
Loved the snippet you just wrote! Is it from a larger story?
The person who writes under the names of Chum/stream.....Well there completely off their nut!So pay them little heed. Just keep on keeping on my man ,you always make me smile:)!
Good day sir, it's the afternoon here my friend and i'm having a good day, hope you are to
Read that streamline and chummin or was it just streamline busting your arse abit, that's not very godly of them surely they should be more understanding with our supposed plight?
teh story above is an extract from my head this morning, fuck knows what it's about, i wrote it to put the sociological study in a twist, all it's done is put my head in a twist
fof: are you for real, Pistaker reckons you're one of his aliases ?
The Chummin group is a possible terrorist organization that is "Patrolling" Glumbert for something they call "terror-simps". They have admitted to carrying out terrorist actions, for which they have not been caught. Just about everyone on Glumbert is a terror-simp except for Streamlined.
It is possible, and perhaps likely that they will offer up any excuse to disguise their actual purpose. If you read their Ted Kaczynski Uni-Bomber like manifestos that write now and again you will get a clearer idea of what they are about.
skidmarks. is this a puzzle? did the cat kill the tramp? i had a cat once that tried to kill me, but i managed to get it off me before it could bite my neck. my daddy threw it in the silo to let it eat rats but it didnt find any and got skinny and died.
if folks are going to study us we should get some money for it. my sister tested drugs for glaxo once and they paid her $50. her tits shrunk a bit but they were big anyways.
This guy is nuts. I used to ride a unicycle when I was younger and it's definitely not easy. I wouldn't want to be walking some of the places he's riding. However it makes my balls hurt just watching it. I can only imagine how many times he's gotten wracked doing those stunts.
I can see it now.... Technoviking will Drink deeply from his water, then point!! Thus sending those terrorists stumbling away with heads lowered and totality humiliated!!LOLOLOL!
Hi Canuck...
I guess you noticed then that (at least) part of the fires were started by arsnists (one was shot and killed) and that a plot was recently uncovered that Al Qaeda was looking to start fires in SoCal.
Maybe not this fire.
I have been looking all around Alexanderplatz for the mighty Technoviking - He is not to be seen. Technoviking, have you forsaken us? Please, answer us in our time of need, oh mighty Technoviking, and point the way to us. I left the methadone program as I thought I had found an answer to the confusion in my life, and you would tell me which water to drink, and how to protect my precious bodily fluids. Oh, please answer me Technoviking. Hear my pleas!!!!!!!!!
Hey Canuck - Streamy can't watch TV, he doesn't own one. Instead he kneels before his statue of Bush in a trance like state, rocking to and fro, absorbing knowledge from his idol... this explains his view I guess
Canuck...Why the anger? You said something silly, I commented and then...tada...nothing from you. No links to articles (presumably what an educated person would do) just another bigoted response...that, surprahz surprahz surpahz, awakened the sleeping genius, Mako, who retorted with a good joke.
(Good one Mako)
So, would it be good or bad that the fires were started by Islamic terrorists or just mean and cruel people? What do you two wish? I know you don't think the fires are a good thing, but if you had your preference as to whom the arsonists would be...?
Mako- Did you happen to catch the D'Souza/Hitchens debate?
...and on Hitchens vs D'Souza why debate something which I imagine not to exist versus you imagining it to exist?
It's a pointless and irrelevant exercise here although the debate was fun to watch
If all concepts must have a real ontological existence (ie the fact you imagine God exists means that he really does) then by equal right my imagining no such thing is just as valid.
Neither view can be proven one way or the other so the common ground is imagination.
All of us have imagination. We put it to use in different ways.
Your imagination sees Bush continuing his righteous path of imperialism, ignoring internationally acknowledged laws; whilst incorporating young earth creationism into school science and making abortion illegal worldwide.
Your imagination would also see all other belief systems belittled and derided at the expense of your own
My imagination does not. And I don't harang and condescend to others about my beliefs unless they set the tone (like you do)
So with no respect whatsoever, go get humped by a dog you pompous little suffed snake
PS Heard how amino acids (the building blocks of life) can be formed under electrical discharge... such as lightning?
PPS Here's Jacobson's letter of retraction in case you can't find it. The website it resides in will not be on your favourites list
Mako...the entertainment value of your bloviations is generally worth it. Knowing how desperately you seek convincing others of your smarts is what makes this all fun.
Thank you for the retraction. He retracted unsubstantiated hypothesizing with...drum roll please...more unsubstantiated hypothesizing.
Better feed that hampster in your noggin, Mako...he's getting tired and I don't think he's spinning the treadmill.
(Again, for those keeping score: Logic and Reason tossed aside in favor of submission to an expert.) You are most certainly one of the crowd.
Mako, dearheart...
Still mining the differences between proof and evidence.
Listen closely: Please read his retraction and his reasons. They were not scientific. Why, if I didn't know better I would have to assume the old "I'm taking my ball home because you won't play my way" argument.
What have others had to say about this retraction? What were the arguments at the time? Of the myriad of unsubstantiated hypotheses about life's origins, does his have more or less credibility?
Notice he did not retract all his research that presumably lead to his conclusions.
Rather a silly post there Streamy - It has less credibility as science has advanced far enough for him to retract. He's a good scientist who understands the advancement of knowledge and the humility of retraction
Oh... and the fact his work was being falsely touted as pro-creationist by your little witch-dipping chums
Streamy as you're incapable of actually absorbing secondary material when posted as a link, here are Jacobson's words:
In January 1955, American Scientist published my article, "Information, Reproduction and the Origin of Life" (Vol. 43, No. 1). I ask you to honor my request to retract two brief passages, as follows:
On page 121: "Directions for the reproduction of plans, for energy and the extraction of parts from the current environment, for the growth sequence, and for the effector mechanisms translating instructions into growth—all had to be simultaneously present at that moment [of life's birth]."
On page 125: "From the probability standpoint, the ordering of the present environment into a single amino acid molecule would be utterly improbable in all the time and space available for the origin of terrestrial life."
I have several reasons for retracting the statements. For the first passage, use of the requirement of simultaneity was a conjecture, unsupported by any proof. Separate developments of partial structures might well have occurred in an environment of randomly reacting molecules, eventually to join into one or more self-reproducing structures.
The second passage refers only to an attempt to calculate the probability that a single molecule of a particular amino acid could spontaneously form from its components. The calculation was irrelevant, as it was based on an endothermic change during an imaginary spontaneous conversion of a mixture of component atoms and molecules into glycine under adiabatic and standard conditions, with no external source of energy. Such changes cannot spontaneously take place. Molecules of increased complexity have been found, however, when necessary components are available, with the aid of ambient energy from natural or experimental systems, e.g. electrical discharges, substantial temperature gradients or contiguous compounds or elements whose chemical reactions produce free energy. All of these could have existed under early Earth conditions, and thus this passage is completely inapplicable.
*THE ABOVE IS WHERE LIGHTNING CAN COME IN STREAMY - A SCIENTIFIC PROBABILITY I THINK YOU'LL FIND*
Retraction this untimely is not normally undertaken, but in this case I request it because of continued irresponsible contemporary use by creationists who have quoted my not merely out-of-context, but incorrect, statements, to support their dubious viewpoint. I am deeply embarrassed to have been the originator of such misstatements, allowing bad science to have come into the purview of those who use it for anti-science ends.
Homer Jacobson
Brooklyn College
The City University of New York
good point cnpalmer75 (you sound like a robot) we always want more , this is the evolutional power of our nature, we will never be satisfied until we see just a torso riding a unicycle
Obviously, the biker drained the bottle already - no other explanation for his entertaining-but-only-to-someone-who's-not-doing-it " adventures. Oh...wait....abject stupidity might also be at work...
so:
My apologies to all of Scotland. Keep up the good work.
Holy fuck.....I swear (literally) that that first scene is from the top of the CHIEF....(or Stewamus Chief in B.C. for those that don't know).....oms...it's a small world! If I'm wrong ya better tell me, please...
Holy double fuck!....the whole thing was filmed in my backyard (so to speak) I never rode down those trails or jumped over those spots....but, hell ya, welcome to my fucking backyard y'all.....damn they made Vancouver look hot!.....I love my home....
I hear a lot of international spy's hang out in Vancouver plying there dark and mysterious trades> Justme are you or Riza A mysterious international spy???
Always a pleasure reading your most eloquence postings, please do tell where does the family educate ones self, would you suggest the privately owned school of the gutter, i understand that this particular award winning school has again surpassed its self by lowering its standards even further than one could imagine.
Comments (89)
To post a comment, you need to login or signup.